No Dt Service regulations of. APSEB. No Dt and. No Dt APSEB pension rules. to APSEB. (Revised) Conduct Regulations -Orders -Issued. -~ ~~-~-~~-~-~ in the service All Deputy General Managers/P&G Services/SPDCL/Tirupati. APSPDCL -APSEB Leave Regulations as adopted by APSPDCL -Grant of Maternity in exercise of the powers referred to in Regulation 41 of APSEB Service.
|Published (Last):||26 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||8.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For computation of the minimum service i. Key Phrases are not available yet.
(V.) RULES, REGULATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, MANUAL AND RECORDS FOR DISCHARGING FUNCTIONS
Sanction of all kinds B. The learned Counsel for the petitioner invites us to interfere with the punishment imposed involving the principle of proportionality.
This objection of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, falls flat.
The nature of my sickness has not permitted to make a leave application in advance and obtain permission and then proceed on leave. There was no legislation then relating to trade unions More information.
Except to the extent indicated above, the Writ Petition is dismissed. State of West Bengal I-LLJ regulatiins charges involving consequences dervice termination of service must be specific, though a departmental enquiry is not like a criminal trial as was noted by this Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v.
In Memo dated October 27, the 2nd respondent observed as follows: The order of the 1st respondent communicated in Memo dt. Raghavaiah, former AAE E1 has indulged in unauthorised absence exceeding one year period and consequently attracts the provisions under Reg.
Apseb service regulations part iii republican can
No Case or Topic can be added. Its proportionality also cannot be gone into by the Court He emphatically denied what had been alleged against him and described the charges as false and actuated by malafides. Suvarna Paravanige Gruha Nakshe. Holding that the charges were vague and indefinite because of lack of particulars, the Supreme Court observed as follows:. If a person is not told clearly and definitely what the allegations are on which the charges preferred against him are founded he cannot possibly, by projecting his own imagination, discover all the facts and circumstances that may be in the contemplation of the authorities to be established against him.
As per ESI Act. December 27, that he should be apssb at Vijayawada, Refulations or Bapatla and thereafter failed to respond to the two telegrams issued by the Superintending Engineer on April 15, and July 9, Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. The next contention urged by Mr.
Electricpoints – Source of Power: APSEB Service Regulations Part II
Supreme Court Of India12 Jan This is a sample not the full document Buy the full document in Word format Select from the following options: Sharma II-LLJwhile applying the rule of ‘audi alterm partem the primary principle of natural justicethe Court must always bear in mind the ultimate and overriding objective underlying the said rule to ensure a fair hearing and to ensure that there is no failure of justice and it is this objective which should guide the Court in applying the rule to varying situations that arise before it.
Supervisor” the “Sub Engineer” was substituted and the “Sub Overseers” cadre was ommitted Diploma Holders recruited after The FCPA prohibits political subdivisions of the state, such. October 11, F. On that basis the 2nd respondent observed that the period of absence of the petitioner from October 11, upto February 28, was unauthorised absence for a continuous period of more than one year, thereby attracting the provisions of the said Regulation 28 3and sought the explanation of the petitioner as to why he should not be deemed to have resigned from the service of the Board with effect from October 11, in terms of the said Regulation 28 3.
To the extent that a chapter does not have bylaws or operational More information.
Raghavaiah during his tenure as Addl. Processing of files for 1. The petitioner did not question any of the charges as vague or wanting in particulars. The 2nd respondent finally held as follows: Directing that the candidates who possessed Diploma in Engineering and srrvice candidates who possessed Graduation in Engineering in addition to Diploma in Engineering in relevant Discipline shall be considered for direct recruitment to the post of Sub-Engineer.
Mechanism to monitor compliance with employment law in outsourced operations. This contention of the accused is not acceptable. His contention that he had left for Madras on April 15, due to the serious condition and had appointment with the Doctors at Madras on April 29, that is after two weeks of his stay at Madras is not convincing and indicates that his condition is really not serious and this is only a ploy to avoid his presence before the Superintending Engineer on April 16,