Transcript of DAYTONSKI SPORAZUM. Rat u BiH 1. – U početku je to sukob pripadnika vojske Srbske krajine i vojske. Piše: Mate Granić. Sjedinjene Američke Države su se uključile u mirovni proces u siječnju godine, nakon što je odbačen Wance-Owenov. Your online bookstore—millions of USED books at bargain prices. Super selection, low prices and great service. Free shipping. Satisfaction guaranteed.
|Published (Last):||2 October 2009|
|PDF File Size:||8.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.73 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In other projects Wikimedia Commons.
Dobra podloga za nadgradnju
November Learn how and when to remove this template message. Dejtonski mirovni sporazumCroatian: Retrieved 5 May The agreement’s main purpose is to promote peace and stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to endorse regional balance in and around the former Yugoslavia Article V, annex 1-Bthus in a regional perspective. Wikimedia Commons has media daytonsli to Dayton Agreement.
Richard Holbrooke wanted to prevent posturing through early leaks to the press. Retrieved 16 January The Court reached the conclusion that it is not competent to decide the dispute in regards to the mentioned decisions since the applicants were not subjects that were identified in Article VI. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Sporazkm from ” https: Curbing the participants’ ability to negotiate via the media was a particularly important consideration. This page was last edited on 31 Decemberat Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina President list: By making the remark in the manner of obiter dictum concerning the Annex IV the Constitution and the rest of the peace agreement, the Court actually “established the ground for legal unity ”  of the entire peace agreement, which further implied that all of the annexes are in the hierarchical equality.
It was one of the early cases in which the Court had to deal with the question of the legal nature of the Constitution.
Though basic elements of the Dayton Agreement were proposed in international talks as early as these negotiations were initiated following the unsuccessful previous peace efforts and arrangementsthe August Croatian military Operation Storm and its aftermath, the government military offensive against the Republika Srpskaconducted in parallel with NATO’s Operation Deliberate Force. Retrieved 21 November Retrieved 13 April Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding: The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina was adopted as Annex IV to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and consequently there cannot be a conflict or a possibility for controversy between this Agreement and the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Bosnia and Herzegovina is a complete state, as opposed to a confederation; no entity or entities could ever be separated from Bosnia and Herzegovina unless by due legal process. Cantons of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. A key component of this was the delineation of the Inter-Entity Boundary Line to which many of the tasks listed in the Annexes referred.
Seated from left to right: Still, the Dayton Agreement proved to be a highly flexible instrument, allowing Bosnia and Herzegovina to move from an early post-conflict phase through reconstruction and consolidation, passing from a consociationalist approach to a more integrationist one.
Category:Dayton Agreement – Wikimedia Commons
Dejtonski mirovni sporazumSerbian: Wolfgang PetritschOHRhas argued that the Dayton framework has allowed the international community to move “from statebuilding via institutions and capacity-building to identity building”, putting Bosnia and Herzegovina “on the road to Brussels “. The Court used the same reasoning to dismiss the similar claim in a later case.
Daytosnki was thefore defined as a “construction of necessity”.
The Court also rejected the other request:. During September and Octoberworld powers especially the United States and Russiagathered in the Contact Groupapplied intense pressure to the leaders of the three sides to attend the negotiations in Dayton, Ohio.
The secure site was chosen in order to remove all the parties from their comfort zone, without which they would have little incentive to negotiate; to reduce their ability to negotiate through the media; and to securely house over staff and attendants. In later decisions the Court confirmed that by using other annexes of the peace agreement as a direct base for the analysis, not only in the context of systematic interpretation of the Annex IV.
The Office of the High Representative was charged with the task of civil implementation.