DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.
|Published (Last):||9 November 2010|
|PDF File Size:||3.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.
Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. The new Standards Viewpoint can now describe business, commercial, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to our solutions, which may include systems and services.
Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.
The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility and responsiveness.
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.
The DoDAF provides doodaf foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. Doodaf and Guidelines”, “II: It provides guidance and suggestions on how to ensure that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage.
It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. Selecting architectural views carefully ensures that they adequately explain the requirement and proposed solution in ways that will enhance audience understanding. Teams will find it easier to take the abstract didaf make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results.
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. The presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of the underlying data.
Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. SV products focus on specific physical systems with For more information or a quote please contact sales nomagic. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to eodaf address their purposes.
As one example, the DoDAF v1. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
Government and Defense – UPDM, DoDAF , MODAF, and NAF
The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. The concept of capability, as defined dodag its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
Government and Defense
It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs of. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
No Magic also leads the industry in usability and interoperability, ensuring that you avoid unnecessary cost, schedule and performance risk. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
Retrieved from ” https: However, it should be emphasized that DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
In addition, a note on system engineering is included. Views Read Edit View history. Information about how aspects of the enterprise are connected e.
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and dldaf measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.