Appearing in the UK four years after its original US publication, Proust Was a Neuroscientist is an assured debut by Jonah Lehrer, best known. A few weeks ago, I wrote about Jonah Lehrer’s book How We Decide being removed from sale because some of its contents were plagiarized. Neuroscience now knows that Whitman’s poetry spoke the truth: emotions are generated by the body. Ephemeral as they seem, our feelings.
|Published (Last):||12 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||19.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It was at that time that he began reading Proust. I did feel that Lehrer romanticizes the artists in the book slightly, possibly because he’s less an artist than a scientist? Languages Italiano Edit links. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Forget the scientific method and go neurosscientist like a good historian: And he really is a damn good writer.
May Learn how and when to remove this template message. It is not clear why the last line of the paragraph was omitted, as the rest of the paragraph is subsequently discussed fairly thoroughly. The Whitmanesque electricity of all the thought and heart he has put into this book fizzes from each sentence.
The act of remembering can alter the memory. Proust was fanatically neurotic. Not the least of it’s merits are the light it sheds on the life of the artist’s discussed. Nevertheless, Whitman, who cared for soldiers in hospitals during the Civil War, put forth, in his poetry, the relationship between the body, the whole body, and emotion. It is because of this experience that he came to see the interconnection between mind and body.
Which was a disappointment, to say the least. I love the insights into both momentous modernist creative works and science. I just didn’t buy it. In this book, Lehrer asks why, when it comes to understanding the mind, neuroscience has been pipped to the post, not once, but time and time neeuroscientist, by writers, artists, composers and cooks, especially those working in the early part of the 20th century.
Where I prroust with him leads me to think things out for myself, and the fascinating work he does linking art and science inspires me to read more, to learn more.
Proust Was a Neuroscientist by Jonah Lehrer: review – Telegraph
At the end of the 19th century, surrealism, occultism and psychoanalysis were all born out of a growing awareness that science, narrowly conceived, had no way of studying the mind.
Take the human mind. More from the web. View all 3 comments. Then he shows how Cezanne intimated the true nature of visual perception and Stravinsky of how we apprehend music. As a story about certain artists and how their work fit in with the science of their day and how it can be understood in terms pgoust current science, it is really entertaining I would also recommend “The Disappearing Spoon” for some fun stories about the elements of the periodic table.
One of the great pleasures of this book is to read intensely waas, cogently argued apologias for people whose towering achievements you might not otherwise be able to stomach. After a good insight about her work Leher brings the association of Middlemarch’s characters and neuroplasticity.
Really delightful introduction to some of the fascinating ways in which art and science interact. His literary interpretations of works like Middlemarch, In Search of Lost Time, and To the Lighthouse do not stray from traditional readings and offer anything new as far as literary criticism goes, but that’s not really in the scope of this book.
As such it has some refreshing and thought-provoking ideas, although they are somewhat speculative.
Unfortunately, our current culture subscribes to a very narrow definition of truth. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. If you believe, as I do, that science is an art and that art is a science, this book will be fascinating. I think it is better to say that art helps us to discover what we do not yet understand and know, and once those problems are solved, it will discover more.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.
Proust Was a Neuroscientist by Jonah Lehrer: review
Postmodernists, he says, can write off the discoveries of science as “nothing but another text” while scientist can write off the humanities as “hopelessly false.
Lehrer is very sincerely trying to bring the arts and science back together – to repair the right of C. There is no reason to boost up French chef Auguste Escoffier as the inventor of umami when in neursocientist he was simply another contributor to our general understanding of taste, so why not simply fold in Escoffier and to nuroscientist chapter about taste?
I know that many would argue that by all laws of probability, some artists chefs, writers, painters, etc.
What they understood intuitively and expressed through their respective art forms — the fallibility of memory, the malleability of the brain, the subtleties of vision, and the deep structure of language — science has only now begun to measure lehref confirm. I am sick to death of the phrase “eminently readable” but if I were to use it, it would be in this review.
The Problems with Jonah Lehrer’s “Proust Was a Neuroscientist” | All About Work
Want to Read saving…. Can art give us a better closeness to our consciousness than the reductionist approach of neuroscience? For a long period of time she studied automatic writing and came to the conclusion that the structure of language is built in our brains. But every method, even the experimental method, has limits.
The structure exists independently of the words. It concerns a subject near and dear to my heart: So what the hell went wrong? Secondly, it gives me a different and wider perspective of an artist’s work and enhances me to put attention in details that I might have been missing.
Thank you to my goodread friends who recommended it. If you liked “Proust was a Neuroscientist”, you do not want to miss “The Age of Insight” by a genius in the field of Neuroscience.